A Potent Ghrelin Inverse Agonist: Substance P [D-Arg1 D-Phe5 D-Trp7 ,9 Leu11]
High Constitutive Signaling of the Ghrelin
Receptor-Identification of a Potent Inverse Agonist
Ghrelin is a GH (GH) releasing peptide, which also
has an important role as an orexigenic hormone stimulating food
intake. By measuring inositol phosphate turnover or by using a
reporter assay for transcriptional activity controlled by cAMP
responsive elements, the ghrelin receptor showed strong, ligand-independent
signaling in transfected COS-7 or HEK293 cells. Ghrelin and a
number of the known non-peptide GH secretagogues acted as agonists
stimulating inositol phosphate turnover further. In contrast, the
low potency ghrelin antagonist,
[D-Arg(1),D-Phe(5),D-Trp(7,9),Leu(11)]-substance P was
surprisingly found to be a high potency (EC50 = 5.2 nM) full
inverse agonist as it decreased the constitutive signaling of the
ghrelin receptor down to that observed in un-transfected cells.
The homologous motilin receptor functioned as a negative control
as it did not display any sign of constitutive activity; however,
upon agonist stimulation the motilin receptor signaled as strongly
as the un-stimulated ghrelin receptor. It is concluded that the
ghrelin receptor is highly constitutively active and that this
activity could be of physiological importance in its role as a
regulator of both GH secretion and appetite control. It is
suggested that inverse agonists for the ghrelin receptor could be
particularly interesting for the treatment of obesity.
Holst B, et al. Mol Endocrinol. 2003 Aug 7 [Epub
ahead of print].
[D-Lys3]-GHRP-6's antagonist activity in Ghrelin induced growth-hormone
secretion in prepubertal rats
Ghrelin is a 28-amino-acid peptide, with an essential n-octanoyl
modification at Ser3, that elicits growth-hormone (GH) secretion
in rats and humans. At present, the mechanisms of ghrelin action
and its interactions with other systems controlling GH secretion
remain poorly characterized. In this context, the present study
was undertaken to obtain information about ontogeny and possible
gender differences in the GH-releasing activity of ghrelin, and
to delineate its primary site(s) of action at the hypothalamus and/or
pituitary. In addition, the interactions between ghrelin and other
relevant signals in the control of GH secretion, such as excitatory
amino acids (EAAs), nitric oxide (NO) and serotonin, were assessed.
Experiments were carried out in infantile-prepubertal animals, when
GH pulsatility is not yet established. Systemic administration of
ghrelin (25 nmol/rat, i.p.) to 5-, 10- and 23-day-old male and female
rats increased plasma GH levels from day 10 onwards. This action
was NO dependent, since it disappeared in 23-day-old males after
pretreatment with an inhibitor of NO synthase (NAME). Similarly,
central infusion of ghrelin (3 nmol/rat, i.c.v.) elicited GH responses
in 10- and 23-day-old animals significantly higher than after systemic
administration. By contrast, in vitro challenge of pituitary tissue
with increasing doses of ghrelin (10(-9)-10(-7) M) failed to enhance
GH release into the incubation medium, whereas stimulation with
GH-releasing hormone (GHRH; 10(-7) M) or GHRP-6 (10(-7) M) was effective.
Finally, effects of ghrelin were blocked by pretreatment with MK-801
and NBQX antagonists of EAA ionotropic receptors and after manipulation
of endogenous serotoninergic tone. In addition, the potent releasing
activity of EAA agonists NMDA and AMPA was blunted by pretreatment
with D-Lys3-GHRP-6, a selective antagonist of the cognate ghrelin
receptor, i.e. the GH-secretagogue receptor. In conclusion, our
results demonstrate that GH-releasing activity of ghrelin appears
early in the infantile period, is NO dependent and involves a primary
hypothalamic site of action. The data also demonstrate for the first
time the existence of a cross-talk between ghrelin and other neurotransmitter
systems, such as EAAs and serotonin, in precise control of GH secretion.
Pinilla L, et al. Neuroendocrinology 2003
Feb;77(2):83-90
Antagonism of ghrelin receptor reduces food intake
and body weight gain in mice
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Ghrelin, an endogenous ligand
for growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHS-R), is an appetite
stimulatory signal from the stomach with structural resemblance
to motilin. We examined the effects of the gastric peptide ghrelin
and GHS-R antagonists on energy balance and glycaemic control in
mice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Body weight, fat mass, glucose, insulin,
and gene expression of leptin, adiponectin, and resistin in white
adipose tissue (WAT) were measured after repeated administrations
of ghrelin under a high fat diet. Gastric ghrelin gene expression
was assessed by northern blot analysis. Energy intake and gastric
emptying were measured after administration of GHS-R antagonists.
Repeated administration of GHS-R antagonist was continued for six
days in ob/ob obese mice. RESULTS: Ghrelin induced remarkable adiposity
and worsened glycaemic control under a high fat diet. Pair feeding
inhibited this effect. Ghrelin elevated leptin mRNA expression and
reduced resistin mRNA expression. Gastric ghrelin mRNA expression
during fasting was increased by a high fat diet. GHS-R antagonists
decreased energy intake in lean mice, in mice with diet induced
obesity, and in ob/ob obese mice; it also reduced the rate of gastric
emptying. Repeated administration of GHS-R antagonist decreased
body weight gain and improved glycaemic control in ob/ob obese mice.
CONCLUSIONS: Ghrelin appears to be closely related to excess weight
gain, adiposity, and insulin resistance, particularly under a high
fat diet and in the dynamic stage. Gastric peptide ghrelin and GHS-R
may be promising therapeutic targets not only for anorexia-cachexia
but also for obesity and type 2 diabetes, which are becoming increasingly
prevalent worldwide.
Asakawa A, et al. Gut. 2003
Jul;52(7):947-52
Effects of ghrelin administered
intraperitoneally (3 nmol/mouse every 12 hours for
five days) on calorie intake, epididymal fat mass,
gastrocnemius muscle, and blood glucose, insulin,
cholesterol, triglycerides, and free fatty acid
concentrations in lean mice under a high fat diet
LF, saline
HF, saline
HF, ghrelin
Calorie intake (kcal/day)
18.83 (1.055)
23.22 (1.329)
25.94 (2.562)*
Fat pad mass(g)
0.533 (0.049)
0.797 (0.095)
1.202 (0.175)**
Skeletal musde (g)
0.337 (0.016)
0.353 (0.010)
0.340 (0.005)
Glucose (mmol/l)
7.899 (0.476)
8.393 (0.825)
8.909 (0.498)
Insulin (pmol/l)
135.0 (20.10)
177.5 (13.05)
378.0 (141.8)*
Cholesterol (mmol/l)
3.742 (0.337)
5.568 (0.497)
5.813 (0.509)**
Triglycerides (mmol/l)
0.347 (0.032)
0.305 (0.039)
0.371 (0.090)
Free fatty acids (meq/l)
1.467 (0.050)
1.623 (0.100)
1.636 (0.047)
Results are expressed
as mean (SEM).
LF and HF indicate a
standard diet and a high fat diet, respectively.
*p<0.05,
**p<0.01 between saline treated mice fed a
standard diet and ghrelin treated mice fed a high
fat diet.
p<0.05
between saline treated mice fed a high fat diet and
ghrelin treated mice fed a high fat diet.
Chronic effects of ghrelin administered
intraperitoneally (3 nmol/mouse every 12 hours for five days) on
resistin gene expression in the epididymal fat mass under a high
fat (HF) diet, as assessed by northern blot analysis, expressed as
a percentage of physiological saline treated controls under a
standard (LF) diet. Results are expressed as mean (SEM): n
indicates the number of mice used, *p<0.05 between saline
treated mice fed a high fat diet and ghrelin treated mice fed a
high fat diet. (B) Stimulatory effects of a high fat diet for two
weeks on ghrelin gene expression in the stomach of food deprived
mice, as assessed by northern blot analysis, expressed as a
percentage of standard diet fed controls. (Top) A representative
northern blot analysis showing gastric ghrelin mRNA during fasting
after a high fat diet for two weeks; *p<0.05 compared with the
control group by Bonferroni’s t test. G3PDH,
glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase.
Effects of intraperitoneally administered [D-Lys-3]-GHRP-6
(2–200 nmol/mouse) on cumulative food intake in food deprived
lean mice: *p<0.05, **p<0.01 compared with the control group
by Bonferroni’s t test. (B) Effects of
intracerebroventricularly administered [D-Lys-3]-GHRP-6 (0.2–20
nmol/mouse) on cumulative food intake in food deprived lean mice.
ACSF, artificial cerebrospinal fluid. (C) Antagonistic effects of
[D-Lys-3]-GHRP-6 administered intracerebroventricularly (20 nmol/mouse)
on feeding induced by intraperitoneal injection of ghrelin (3 nmol/mouse)
in non-food deprived lean mice. (D) Inhibitory effects of
intraperitoneally administered [D-Lys- 3]-GHRP-6 (20–200 nmol/mouse)
on the gastric emptying rate one and two hours after injection in
lean mice. (E) Effects of intraperitoneally administered [D-Arg-1,
D-Phe-5, D- Trp-7, 9, Leu-11] substance P (10–100 nmol/mouse) on
cumulative food intake in food deprived lean mice. (F) Effects of
intraperitoneally administered [D-Lys-3]-GHRP-6 (20–200 nmol/mouse)
on cumulative food intake in mice with diet induced obesity who
received a high fat diet for two weeks.
Acute effects of intraperitoneally administered [D-Lys-3]-GHRP-6
(200 nmol/mouse) on cumulative food intake in food deprived ob/ob
obese mice: *p<0.05, **p<0.01 compared with physiological
saline treated controls. (B) Chronic effects of [D-Lys- 3]-GHRP-6
administered intraperitoneally (20–200 nmol/mouse every 12 hours
for six days) on body weight gain in non-food deprived ob/ob
obese mice.
Effects of [D-Lys-3]-GHRP-6 administered
intraperitoneally (20–200 nmol/mouse every 12 hours for
six days) on food intake, epididymal fat mass,
gastrocnemius muscle, and blood glucose, insulin,
cholesterol, triglyceride, and free fatty acid
concentrations in ob/ob obese mice
Saline
20 nmol
200 nmol
Food intake (g/day)
4.845 (0.160)
4.527 (0.261)
4.285 (0.298)
Fat pad mass (g)
0.974 (0.066)
0.897 (0.169)
0.860 (0.086)
Skeletal muscle (g)
0.300 (0.012)
0.314 (0.009)
0.326 (0.013)
Glucose (mmolli)
13.01 (1.538)
12.06 (1.549)
7.489 (1.081)*
Insulin (pmol/1)
8294 (1676)
6242 (1628)
5481 (1304)
Cholesterol (mmol/1)
6.649 (0.346)
5.663 (0.291)
5.906 (0.565)
Triglycerides (mmol/l)
0.518 (0.049)
0.436 (0.040)
0.465 (0.068)
Free fatty acids (meq/l)
2.164 (0.075)
2.036 (0.121)
1.646 (0.078)**
*p<0.05,
**p<0.01 compared with physiological saline
treated controls.
GHRF-6, An Agonist for Ghrelin receptor (GHS-R)
Interaction of the growth hormone releasing
peptides, ghrelin and GHRP-6, with the motilin receptor in the
rabbit gastric antrum
The structural relationship between the motilin and the growth hormone
secretagogue receptor (GHS-R), and between their respective ligands,
motilin and ghrelin, prompted us to investigate whether ghrelin
and the GHS-R agonist, growth hormone releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6),
could interact with the motilin receptor. The interaction was evaluated
in the rabbit gastric antrum with binding studies on membrane preparations
and with contraction studies on muscle strips in the presence of
selective antagonists under conditions of electrical field stimulation
(EFS) or not. Binding studies indicated that the affinity (pKd)
for the motilin receptor was in the order of: ghrelin (4.230.07)
< GHRP-6 (5.540.08) < motilin (9.130.03). The interaction
of ghrelin with the motilin receptor requires the octanoyl group.
Motilin induced smooth muscle contractile responses but ghrelin
and GHRP-6 were ineffective. EFS elicited on- and off-responses
that were increased by motilin already at 10(-9) M, but not by 10(-5)
M ghrelin. In contrast, GHRP-6 also enhanced the on- and off-responses.
The motilin antagonist, GM-109, blocked the effect of GHRP-6 on
the off- but not on the on-responses. Under NANC conditions the
effects of motilin and GHRP-6 on the on-responses were abolished,
those on the off-responses were preserved. All responses were blocked
by NK1 and NK2 antagonists. In conclusion, ghrelin is unable to
induce contractions via the motilin receptor. However, GHRP-6 enhances
neural contractile responses, partially via interaction with the
motilin receptor on non-cholinergic tachykininergic nerves, partially
via another receptor that may be a GHS-R subtype on cholinergic
nerves that corelease tachykinins.
Depoortere I, et al. J Pharmacol
Exp Ther 2003 Feb 11; [epub ahead of print]
Differential transport of mouse
ghrelin, des-octanoyl mouse ghrelin, and human ghrelin across
the blood-brain barrier in mice. Although octanoylated (bioactive)
mouse ghrelin crosses the mouse BBB predominantly in the brain-to-blood
direction, passage for des-octanoyl mouse ghrelin was observed
only in the blood-to-brain direction. Human ghrelin, which
differs from mouse ghrelin by two amino residues only, was
transported in both directions in mice. The extent and direction
in which the ghrelin can cross the BBB is therefore influenced
by at least two features of its primary structure, its post-translationally
added fatty acid side chain and its amino acid sequence.
William A. Banks,
Matthias Tschöp, Sandra M. Robinson and Mark L.
Heiman. THE JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS.
Vol. 302, Issue 2, 822-827, August 2002